Onboarding and compliance

Measure the training that carries risk.

Compliance training is signed off and forgotten. Check what people retained, catch the gaps while they still matter, and keep a record you can hand to an auditor.

  • Knowledge checks mapped to the policies they cover
  • Gaps surfaced by team before they become incidents
  • Timestamped records for your audit file
Audit export · preview
Data handling policy v4128 of 134 completed
Person and timestampScore
R. Alvarez14 Jul, 09:1292%
T. Bello14 Jul, 11:4078%
K. Novak15 Jul, 08:0554%
Every attempt retained with the policy version it was taken against
What changes

Sign off becomes evidence.

Minutes
Not a module

Short checks that fit inside an onboarding week rather than competing with it.

By policy area
Not one figure

Results broken out by the policy each question maps to, so a gap points somewhere specific.

Retained
With the version

Every attempt stored against the policy version it was taken on, which is what an auditor asks for.

Why it matters here

A signature proves someone clicked accept.

For safety, conduct and data handling, the gap between acknowledging a policy and understanding it is where incidents live. A short check turns an assumption into a record.

  • Short checks that fit into an onboarding week
  • Results by policy area rather than one completion figure
  • Repeat checks over time to see what decays
  • Reminders for anyone who has not completed
Generate from your material
Handbook.pdf48 pages
Past paper 2025scanned
Training video32 min
Course outline12 topics
Generates
46questions mapped to 12 topics
8interactive and spoken items
3difficulty levels per topic
Every generated question is editable before it goes out
Example scenario

Data handling, at onboarding and six months later.

A services firm onboarding 134 staff
Illustrative example built from a typical compliance rollout
Example scenario
The problem

New starters acknowledged the data handling policy on day one. Nothing after that told anyone whether it had been read, let alone understood.

What they did

Uploaded the policy pack, generated a short check against it, sent single use links during onboarding, then repeated a shorter version at six months.

What changed

The initial check passed comfortably. The six month repeat dropped to 61% on retention rules, which became a targeted refresher rather than a whole retraining cycle.

128 / 134
Completed without chasing
61%
Six month retention on one area
1 area
Refreshed instead of the whole policy
How it runs

From policy document to evidence.

The source material is usually a document you already maintain.

01

Import the policy

Upload the handbook or policy pack and LivQuiz drafts checks against what it says.

02

Assign by cohort

Send to new starters, a department, or everyone due a refresh.

03

Track and remind

See completion and results live, with automatic follow up for anyone outstanding.

04

Retain the record

Attempts stored with timestamps and detail, exportable when someone asks.

Questions

Common questions.

Can new starters complete this without an account?

Yes. Single use access links work without a login, which keeps onboarding friction low while still tying results to a person.

How often should checks repeat?

That is your call. Many teams run a check at onboarding and a shorter refresh at six or twelve months to see what decayed.

Does it handle multiple languages?

Content can be generated in 34 languages from the same source policy, so distributed teams are assessed on the same material.

What does the audit export contain?

Who attempted what, when, what they answered, the score, and the policy area each question mapped to.

Turn sign off into evidence

Your people acknowledged the policy. Find out who understood it.

Bring one policy document and we will show you the checks it produces and the record it leaves behind.